If you think all of your genealogy work has been completely done, think again.
The limitations of historical record-keeping make it all too easy for many family members to fall through the cracks and go undetected—even in the fullest family trees.
Goldie May now has a new feature to help you find missing children in the 1900 and 1910 US censuses. This tool has helped me find discrepancies in several of my ancestors' lines between the number of children recorded in the tree and the number reported by the mother in the census.
Want to test this feature to know if your family history research is complete? Here's a quick tutorial on how to use Goldie May to check for missing children.
These two census years are special because census takers asked women these two unique questions:
By comparing the answers to these questions with the research you already have recorded, you can double-check to make sure your family tree is not missing any children who may have died between census years or have remained unrecorded for another reason.
Once you click the link to the census record, Goldie May will prompt you to enter two numbers reported by the woman (or her household):
In the case of the 1900 census, these data are found on the census index page, because these columns of the census were indexed. In the 1910 census, these two columns were not indexed, so you'll need to click over to the original image and zoom in to find the answer to these two questions. (Consider using Goldie May's screenshot feature so you have an easy reference if you need to view the original record again.)
This feature in Goldie May provides an important, secondary check on how many children should be in the family tree.
In my family, this tool revealed one missing child from my great-great-grandmother (possibly two, depending on how you interpret the handwriting) and another missing child from my third-great grandmother. This feature can reveal research opportunities even in the most well-researched family trees.